On bodily Fluids

The below was written at approximately 11pm on 19/1 Saturday while awaiting to watch a movie: Silver Lining, Playbook- which was ironically rather good actually. [ Go Jennifer Lawrence]

The arise of jealousy is really bore from a society rather than from an individual. Robinson Crusoe can never get jealous simply because there is nobody to be envious about.

He can get hungry and thirsty but he never get jealous about the person in London sipping tea and eating breakfast simply because the jealousy will not feed him. The physical nature of the hunger and thirst means that the food is a necessity and not a luxury.

Hence emotions of any sort can be contributed by it's social nature and a biological one. Therefore a lack can contribute to a decision making process. The larger the absence the stronger the emotion.

By extension, the bigger the expression, the larger the lack. The larger the compensation- the larger the hole.

Among the many emotions of which contribute to the emotional decision can arise simply by demonstrating a lack rather than a positive demonstration of quality. And insofar then, in such a manner, one one can create a lack rather than a positive and enhancing decision.

And if all of us have a lack- then the louder the compensation or to the contrary simply demonstrate it's insecurity as opposed to it's assured-ness.

Hence the result of any bad partner selection is simply the result of covering one's personal doubt rather than an accretive one. Therefore if selection is based on covering one's doubt then insofar that the nature of it is ephemeral and never based on any firm fundamentals.

In this manner, when the lack is covered by familiarity- the end is always inevitable.

The criteria of any partner then must be progressive rather than a regressive one. By it's very extension, risk is therefore the basis of all relationship. Without that, any partner selection is therefore simply fitting in a puzzle rather than creation of a new one.

The analogy of a missing puzzle presupposes the existence of the 'one' and if one is a non-believer, there is no 'soul mate' out there to be 'found'.

What is simply left is the almost random nature of one's social interactions. And in so doing, all form of affection are simply one of spontaneity rather than that of tending towards the 'one'.

Any counter actions against one's intuitive emotions is really covering a lack. A lack of which is even deeper than a positive one.

That is the reason for 'hyper' forms of expression- the louder one's actions, the more on the contrary one don't have it.

The reason is that positive is comforting and almost forgetful, a lack is almost an impetus to act. It is an attempt to cover up the guilt of lacking spontaneous reactions.

Hence the need for porn videos to hyper-act the whole act itself simply because it is not spontaneous one but rather an end in itself. It is not a spontaneous act but rather a reactive one.

The same goes for one night stands and anything with strangers- the act is almost always lost in the dizziness of the whole situation rather than an actual experience of it. And if the act itself is the only outcome, I would rather pay since it is simply less cumbersome and straightforward. No strings attached and they won't haunt for anything out of the wedlock.

Hence I don't really see the point in getting the opposite sex drunk simply just to take advantage of them- it is much safer to pay for that. Silence is not necessarily consent. You get the drift.

Hence I am not so sure why the whole world is really quite hung up on getting the love of your life or getting some. This is not a manner of act itself- because it is really pretty straightforward but rather if one isn't really sure what the 'experience' of it- it simply one big whirlwind and dizzy affair. It is really just a release of bodily fluids and nothing else- and why the whole obsession with something we do everyday anyway.

Everyday is filled with all these sexual tension that it's like there is no other things that matter.

The phallus symbol is simply a convenient shape and it is really much difficult to create everything as a dome and it is simply less space consuming isn't it.

And if everything is sexualized to this extent- what of the baby sucking the milk bottle which is really a phallus symbol isn't it.

And hence if phallus symbol is a symbol of strength then a demonstration of a lack can simply demonstrate it's strength. It is simply creation of a lack and providing a solution. And insofar that if any partner selection is simply based on this single criteria- all decisions is simply regressive as the probability of hunting down an animal in the woods is almost nil because we simply can go to the supermarket.

Hence the decisions based on these
'emotional' is almost ephemeral in nature and have no firm grounding and insofar that if all these emotions are socialized to a point of regression- you are better off getting a dog or a cat- since it's definition is as slippery as it is subjective.

And if these emotions were so structured- of what value is true love and free will- you are still better off with a cat or dog.

After a while, one would realize that all these sexual tension is almost not worth it's hype. It is nervous lover's- soft and tender- but smash everything.